Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Was Nike Really To Blame?


            The case, The Gym Shoe Phenomenon: Social Values vs. Marketing by Gail Baker University of Florida, is a case that pertains to a situation where a certain minority felt as though Nike had mislead them and was causing violence due to its marketing choices. The Code of Ethics that I felt was appropriate was the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) Member Code of Ethics. This is because I am interested in doing public relations for a sports related or athletic company. This code of ethics believes in advocacy, honesty, expertise, independence, loyalty and fairness according to the PRSA Code of Ethics website and can also be found from Chapter 2 Ethics Theory Application to Media from Media Ethics.  

            This code of ethics is helpful in evaluating the ethical considerations of this particular case study pertaining to Nike because Nike was able to please its critics going about the necessary public relations steps in order to, in a sense perform, damage control. For Nike, the African-American community blamed Nike for the violence that was occurring. They stated that violence was caused that correlated with Nike shoes due to the fact that there were black athletes are spokesperson and stated that Nike was advertising black superiority. Additionally, they believed that Nike was encouraging black athletes to choose sports over education by the advertising that they were choosing. The PRSA Code of ethics highlights honesty, among other things, for the public. Nike tried to explain that they believed that the two black athletes that they used as advertisers, Bo Jackson Michael Jordan, are both family oriented people who came from great backgrounds. Thus, it was never Nike’s intention to mislead the black youth and encourage violence. Therefore, this also pertains to advocacy that is in the code, which explains that public relations is able to voice “ideas, facts, and viewpoints to aid informed public debate,” according to the PRSA Member Code of Ethics website.
            This code of ethics is not helpful in that, what Nike did in the means of public relations was to change the way the African-American community viewed Nike and hope that they can gain them back as customers. In this instance, Nike chose to use public relations in order to fix the opinions of the critics, instead of actually fighting these beliefs and knowing that they were not in the wrong or the cause of this violence. In a sense they almost humored them, in order to loose customers. Yes, it worked out for them but at the same time, I am not sure that they were ever to blame for the violence that had occurred. Instead, it was just an easy fix for Nike because there are so many well-respected white athletes that can represent Nike, as well.  

            Ethical perspectives that we have covered in class and in readings help to show more views on the considerations of the case. For example, in the reading from Chapter 1, Cases and Moral Systems by Deni Elliot, the article states that one must learn when to reconcile and how or when it is necessary to tolerate divergent point of views. In this case, Nike did just that. They chose to accept the way that the African-American community felt, and reconciled by changing the way they advertised and increasing their African-American employee amount. Additionally, according to the reading Chapter 2 Ethics Theory Application to Media from Media Ethics, ethical concerns are anything from the spokesperson used to the message that is being portrayed. Thus, in this instance, although Nike may not have seen anything wrong with using those two black athletes are their spokesperson on those billboards, the community saw a different message being portrayed than Nike had.
            I thought that this case was particularly helpful in that I learned that, although Nike may not have been acting unethically according to many, it is better to silence negative opinions and to please the consumer because that is what keeps the business prestigious.  I learned that it is sometimes better for companies to just bite the bullet and do what is necessary in order to keep the customers happy.


Work Cited:
blackboard -- Cases and Moral Systems by Deni Elliot
                        Chapter 2 Ethics Theory Application to Media Plaisance, PL. 2009 Media Ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sagehttp://s185.photobucket.com/user/kymroseygooey/media/cool%20stuff/Air-Jordan-Logo-psd2918.png.html
http://www.nicekicks.com/2012/09/11/mache-discusses-the-custom-sneaker-movement-creative-process-his-start/




No comments:

Post a Comment